Teaching and Presentations

Teaching

I currently lecture Early Modern History and Urban History to BA students at the University of Amsterdam.

I have extensive experience teaching history, history of science, and sociology of scientific knowledge at the University of Cambridge. In 2024-25, I co-designed and lectured on the third-year undergraduate course "Scientific Travellers" in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science, and lectured first-year undergraduates on "States and Bureaucracies" in the Faculty of History. I was head supervisor for Paper 1, Part II History and Philosophy of Science in 2022-23, covering the early history of science and medicine, from antiquity to 1800. I supervise third-year undergraduate students in "Revisiting the Scientific Revolution," "Early Medicine," "Visual and Material Culture," and "Traditions of Knowledge and Healing," "Islamic and Chinese Science," "Natural Knowledge in the Enlightenment," "Institutions of Natural Knowledge Production," "Early Modern Natural Knowledge," "Topics in the Social History of Medicine," "Islamic and Chinese Medicine," and "Medicine and Natural History 1500-1800." I have also supervised Paper 2, Part II History and Philosophy of Science, on "Modern Science and Technology in East Asia." In Spring 2022, I gave two invited lectures to undergraduates at Utrecht University on "The Needham Question" and "The Intellectual Origins of Race and Racism in Western Europe."

Conferences

In addition to presenting my research at over thirty-five conferences and workshops across Britain, Europe and the United States, I have co-organised one conference and four panels, including one plenary session.

Cross-contextualisation as method: beyond the global history of science (co-organised with Mika Hyman)

6th June 2025, Cambridge, UK

2025 marks fifteen years since Sujit Sivasundaram published the groundbreaking article “Sciences and the Global: On Methods, Questions, and Theory” in an Isis Focus Section on “Global Histories of Science”. Here, Sivasundaram encouraged scholars interested in writing globally oriented histories of the sciences to adopt a method of “cross-contextualization, where scarce and unorthodox sources are read within and alongside more plentiful and traditional ones.” Recontextualizing sources away from their usual sites of interpretation has thickened historical narratives, offering deeper, decentred, and typically more inclusive accounts of knowledge production. Perhaps more importantly, cross-contextualization as a method also promises – or, depending on one’s positionality, threatens – to perturb long-established scholarly boundaries of what counts as bona fide historical evidence.

Since the publication of Sivasundaram’s article, methods of cross-contextualization are transcending the boundaries of the history of science. Environmental historians have pioneered the integration of diverse types of archives – both “social” and “natural” – to construct “planetary” narratives of the past. Indeed, scholars are responding to Dipesh Chakrabarty’s call to “put geological time and the biological time of evolution in conversation with the time of human history and experience.” Concomitantly, global and cultural historians are increasingly engaging with anthropological, art-historical, and archaeological scholarship, enriching or complicating narratives offered from the vantage-point of more conventional sources. Outside of academic history, curators are interweaving material analysis with acquisition information and textual sources to challenge traditional display practices, while grappling with the politics of museums and questions of repatriation and decolonization. These varied efforts at cross-contextualization (whether explicitly named as such) have functioned to recover practices and perspectives often characterized as irretrievably lost, promising fruitful interdisciplinary collaborations on and off the page.

This workshop will will critically examine how methods akin to cross-contextualization are being reworked more widely – both within and beyond the global history of science. We have invited participants to consider: “Who and what gets to speak in history, and why?”; “How can historians restore the voices, perspectives, and products of the dispossessed to challenge elite histories?”; and, consequently, “What counts as a legitimate historical source?” Drawing on collaborative reflections, the workshop aims to reimagine how scholars, curators, activists, teachers, and students can ultimately produce more emancipatory understandings of the past, reframing commonplace historiographical conventions.

Panel session: "Representing East Indies Worlds in Europe, 1650-1900" at the BSHS Annual Conference 2024 in Aberystwyth

Presenters: Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh (Cambridge), Trude Dijkstra (Amsterdam), Mika Hyman (Cambridge)

Chair: Jim Secord (Cambridge)

Abstract: The expanded ‘East Indies’, comprising the lands, seas, peoples, plants, and animals between the Cape of Good Hope and Hokkaido, long occupied a crucial place in European imaginaries. Simultaneously and relatedly a space of colonial exploitation, commercial opportunities, and historical projection, the East Indies were constructed and represented across an array of different media in Europe between the 1650s and the turn of the twentieth century. This panel explores the disparate strategies through which the diverse natural and cultural worlds of the East Indies were characterized in Europe between the mid seventeenth and late nineteenth centuries. It pays attention to how East Indies plants, animals, and peoples were commodified in European publications and natural history collections. Trude Dijkstra approaches these matters by exploring the shifting representations of Chinese tea in early modern Dutch printed works, spanning from scholarly books to satirical parodies, demonstrating the importance of print in locating early debates on the participation of European women and the ‘lower’ classes in tea rituals. Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh, instead, examines how natural histories and Indigenous social practices at the Cape of Good Hope were transformed and imag(in)ed as belonging to ‘the Western part of the East Indies’ by European writers and mapmakers. Finally, Mika Hyman uses specimens located in the Cambridge University Herbarium as a starting point to explore the significance of Hugh Cuming’s plant collecting practices in representations and understandings of nineteenth-century Philippine flora.

Plenary: "Jesuit Sciences in the Southern Seas" at Scientiae 2023 in Prague

Presenters: Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh (Cambridge), Sebestian Kroupa (Cambridge), Sophia Spielmann (MPIWG Berlin) 

Commentator: Paula Findlen (Stanford)

Abstract: Over the past three decades, scholars have increasingly emphasized the importance of Jesuit missionaries and their engagement with disparate extra-European knowledge traditions in the construction of the early modern sciences. From China to New France to Paraguay, Jesuits served as go-betweens, translating local knowledges embedded in different societies into an ostensibly universal, catholic, Catholic framework. However, studies on Jesuit encounters with extra-European ways of knowing largely focus on bidirectional exchanges, echoing the wider trend in postcolonial studies to examine Europeans’ interactions with and constructions of a binarily opposed Other. This panel seeks to complicate this narrative by exploring the making of hybrid Jesuit sciences in spaces at the nexus between empires and trade networks. Focusing on multicultural spaces located at the confluence of different southern oceans—the Cape of Good Hope, Manila, and Paraguay—this panel will examine the processes through which the Jesuits recrafted distinct extra-European knowledges into an all-encompassing Catholic cosmology. As such, it will shed light on the ways in which Jesuits drew on diverse Indigenous and extra-European knowledge traditions and labour to articulate a distinctly global understanding of nature.

Roundtable: "Appropriation and Erasure: South Africa in the History of Science" at the BSHS Digital Festival for the History of Science 2023

Speakers: Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh (Cambridge), Katherine Arnold (Rachel Carson Center, Munich), Jules Skotnes-Brown (St Andrews) 

Commentator: Isabel Hofmeyr (Witwatersrand)

Abstract: Where does South Africa fit within the history of science? Between the late fifteenth and late nineteenth centuries, almost every traveller sailing between Europe and Asia spent time at the Cape of Good Hope. Despite the increasingly global outlook of the history of science, however, the discipline has thus far failed to pay adequate attention to this crucial intercultural contact-zone. Bringing together early career scholars working on disparate periods, this roundtable explores how southern African natures and Indigenous knowledges were simultaneously appropriated by the sciences and written out of their histories. Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh begins in early modernity, recounting how Jesuit missionaries’ interactions with the Cape’s nature, night skies, and Indigenous Khoekhoen population formed a crucial yet overlooked part of the religious order’s global knowledge-making project. Then, taking us to the nineteenth century, Katherine Arnold investigates how the unique character of the Cape’s endemic fynbos vegetation was ignored by metropolitan botanists despite its central role in taxonomic categorization and biogeographical studies. Finally, focusing on the turn of the twentieth century, Jules Skotnes-Brown examines how Zulu experts on nagana (livestock trypanosomiasis) were erased from the history of medicine in South Africa, despite providing the epistemological foundations and labour necessary for the study of this disease. The roundtable, which invites contributions from the audience, seeks both to restore South Africa’s position in the history of science and explore the ways in which “nature” has been deployed to write out southern African peoples’ knowledges from global histories of science.

Panel session: "Credibility in Circulation" at the History of Science Society Virtual Forum 2020. 

Chair: Pratik Chakrabarti (Houston) Presenters: Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh (Cambridge), Eszter Csillag (Hong Kong), Margaret Gaida (Caltech). 

Commentator: Alexander Statman (UCLA)

Abstract: Little over a decade ago Kapil Raj published his ground-breaking book Relocating Modern Science, which argued that historians of science have much to learn from relocating their studies of the construction of knowledge from specific, localized sites to spaces of circulation. This shift, Raj argues, reveals the indispensable role played by non-European actors and knowledges in the co-construction of methods and practices that have gone on to shape modern "Western" science. Since then, historians-particularly those striving to understand the non-Western character of what has elsewhere been characterized as "European modernity"-have employed Raj's methods to great effect. One key issue that deserves further exploration, using episodes from across historical and geographical demarcations, is that of the credibility of non-European methods in shaping the emergent disciplines associated with "European" or "global" modernity. For example, in his recent work on the "first global turn," Alexander Statman suggested that Europeans' encounters with Chinese history in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries radically reshaped conceptions of what "world history" could look like as an academic discipline. How does a shift from local to circulating spaces change the way historians of science can analyze the construction of credibility? The papers in this panel explore the processes involved in constructing credibility in spaces of circulation and examine whether these reveal previously under-appreciated non-European agency involved in the development of ostensibly "European" methods in emergent disciplines during the Enlightenment. The session seeks to problematize the categories of "credibility," "circulation," and "modernity" in the historical analysis of the emergence of certain disciplinary practices-in particular world historical, astronomical, and natural historical methodologies-in Europe between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries.